Check the appropriate box:

 

Dear Stockholder:

On behalf of our board of directors, I am pleased to invite you to attend the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Sprinklr, Inc., a Delaware corporation (referred to herein as “Sprinklr,” “we,” “us” or the “Company”), to be held virtually, via live audio webcast available at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CXM2026, on June 11, 2026 at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time. We believe that hosting a virtual meeting enables participation by more of our stockholders, while lowering the cost of conducting the Annual Meeting. Stockholders attending the virtual meeting will be afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting. Using the instructions provided in the accompanying proxy statement, you will be able to attend, vote your shares and submit questions electronically during the Annual Meeting.

Our board of directors has fixed the close of business on April 14, 2026 as the record date (the “Record Date”) for the Annual Meeting. Only stockholders of record as of the Record Date are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting or any adjournment, continuation or postponement thereof.

The Annual Meeting will be held for the following purposes:

These items of business are more fully described in the accompanying proxy statement.

Stockholders as of the Record Date and their proxy holders will be able to attend the Annual Meeting, submit questions and vote during the live webcast by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CXM2026 and entering the 16-digit control number included in your Notice of Internet Availability or in the instructions that you received via email. Please refer to the additional logistical details and recommendations in the accompanying proxy statement. You may log-in beginning at 9:45 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on June 11, 2026.

Your vote is very important, regardless of the number of shares you own. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote your shares by proxy in advance of the Annual Meeting through the Internet, by telephone or by completing and returning a printed proxy card or vote instruction form, if you have received one, to ensure that your vote is counted. Even if you have voted by proxy, you may still vote online if you attend the Annual Meeting. Please note, however, that if your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to vote at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a proxy issued in your name from that record holder.

Thank you for the continued trust you place in Sprinklr.

You also may access additional information about Sprinklr, Inc. at www.sprinklr.com and investors.sprinklr.com. References to our websites throughout this proxy statement are provided for convenience only and the content on our website does not constitute a part of this proxy statement.

Pursuant to rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we have sent you the Notice because our board of directors is soliciting your proxy to vote at the 2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, including at any adjournments, continuations or postponements thereof (the “Annual Meeting”).

The Notice, this proxy statement, the proxy card or voting instruction form, and our annual report (collectively, the “Proxy Materials”) are available to stockholders on the Internet. The Notice will provide instructions as to how a stockholder of record may access and review the Proxy Materials on the website referred to in the Notice or, alternatively, how to request that a copy of the Proxy Materials, including a proxy card, be sent by mail or email to the stockholder of record. The Notice also will provide voting instructions. Please note that, while our Proxy Materials are available at the website referenced in the Notice, and this proxy statement and annual report are available on our website, no other information contained on either website is incorporated by reference in, or considered to be a part of, this document.

We intend to mail the Notice on or about May 1, 2026 to all stockholders of record entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. The Proxy Materials will be made available to stockholders on the Internet on the same date.

You will not receive any additional Proxy Materials via mail unless you request a printed copy in accordance with the instructions set forth in the Notice. We may elect, in our discretion, to send you a proxy card and a second Notice on or after 10 calendar days have passed since our first mailing of the Notice.

We will be hosting the Annual Meeting via live audio webcast only. You are entitled to attend the Annual Meeting if you were a stockholder of record as of the close of business on April 14, 2026 (the “Record Date”) or hold a valid proxy for the meeting. Any stockholder can attend the Annual Meeting live online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CXM2026. The Annual Meeting will start at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on June 11, 2026. Stockholders attending the Annual Meeting will be afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting.

To enter the Annual Meeting, you will need the 16-digit control number, which is included in the Notice or on your proxy card if you are a stockholder of record or included with your voting instruction card and voting instructions

received from your broker, bank or other agent if you hold your shares in “street name.” Instructions on how to attend and participate are available at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CXM2026. We recommend that you log in a few minutes before 10:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, to ensure that you are logged in when the Annual Meeting starts. The virtual meeting room will open 15 minutes before the start of the Annual Meeting.

We will hold a question-and-answer session immediately following the conclusion of the business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting. If you would like to submit a question during the Annual Meeting, you may log in at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CXM2026 using your 16-digit control number, type your question in the “Ask a Question” field and click “Submit.” Questions and answers may be grouped by topic and substantially similar questions may be grouped and answered once. We will endeavor to answer as many questions related to the business of the Annual Meeting and that comply with our Annual Meeting Rules of Conduct as time permits. Our Annual Meeting Rules of Conduct will be available at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CXM2026.

We will have technicians ready to assist you with any technical difficulties you may have accessing the virtual Annual Meeting. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual Annual Meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please call the technical support number that will be posted at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/CXM2026.

For the 10 days ending the day prior to the annual meeting, a list of our record stockholders as of the close of business on the Record Date will be made available for examination by any stockholder of record for a legally valid purpose during ordinary business hours at the offices of our corporate headquarters. Please contact Jacob Scott, our General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, via email at ir@sprinklr.com if you would like to examine a list of our record stockholders.

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, there were 132,830,946 shares of Class A common stock and 101,137,893 shares of Class B common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.

Each holder of shares of our Class A common stock will have one vote per share of Class A common stock held as of the Record Date, and each holder of shares of our Class B common stock will have ten votes per share of Class B common stock held as of the Record Date. The holders of the shares of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock will vote as a single class on all matters described in this proxy statement for which your vote is being solicited.

There are three matters scheduled for a vote:

Our board of directors knows of no other matters that will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote on those matters in accordance with their best judgment.

If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote (i) online during the Annual Meeting or (ii) in advance of the Annual Meeting by proxy through the Internet, by telephone or by using a proxy card that you may request or that we may elect to deliver at a later time. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote your shares by proxy in advance of the Annual Meeting through the Internet, by telephone or by completing and returning a printed proxy card or vote instruction form, if you have received one, to ensure that your vote is counted. You may still attend the Annual Meeting and vote online even if you have already voted by proxy.

If you are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of your broker, bank or other agent, you should have received a Notice containing voting instructions from that organization rather than from us. Follow the voting instructions in the Notice to ensure that your vote is counted. To vote online during the Annual Meeting, you must follow the instructions from your broker, bank or other agent.

No. The Notice identifies the items to be voted on at the Annual Meeting, but you cannot vote by marking the Notice and returning it. The Notice provides instructions on how to vote by proxy in advance of the Annual Meeting through the Internet, by telephone, using a printed proxy card or vote instruction form, or online during the Annual Meeting.

If you receive more than one Notice, your shares may be registered in more than one name or in different accounts. Please follow the voting instructions on the Notices to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

If you are a stockholder of record and do not vote through the Internet, by telephone, by completing the proxy card that may be delivered to you or online during the Annual Meeting, your shares will not be voted.

If you return a signed and dated proxy card or otherwise vote without marking voting selections, your shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of our board of directors:

If any other matter is properly presented at the Annual Meeting, your proxyholder (one of the individuals named on your proxy card) will vote your shares using his best judgment.

If you are a beneficial owner and do not instruct your broker, bank or other agent how to vote your shares, the question of whether your broker or nominee will still be able to vote your shares depends on whether, pursuant to stock exchange rules, the particular proposal is deemed to be a “routine” matter. Brokers and nominees can use their discretion to vote “uninstructed” shares with respect to matters that are considered to be “routine,” but not with respect to “non-routine” matters. Under applicable rules and interpretations, “non-routine” matters are matters that may substantially affect the rights or privileges of stockholders, such as mergers, stockholder proposals, elections of directors (even if not contested), executive compensation, and certain corporate governance proposals, even if management supported. Accordingly, your broker or nominee may vote your shares on Proposal 3. Your broker or nominee, however, may not vote your shares on Proposals 1 or 2 without your instructions. Such an event would result in a “broker non-vote” and these shares will not be counted as having been voted on the applicable proposal. Please instruct your bank, broker or other agent to ensure that your vote will be counted.

If you a beneficial owner of shares held in street name and you do not plan to attend the Annual Meeting, in order to ensure that your shares are voted in the way you would prefer, you must provide voting instructions to your broker, bank or other agent by the deadline provided in the materials you receive from your broker, bank or other agent.

As discussed above, when a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” does not give instructions to the broker or nominee holding the shares as to how to vote on matters deemed to be “non-routine,” the broker or nominee cannot vote the shares. These unvoted shares are counted as “broker non-votes.”

Stockholder of Record: Shares Registered in Your Name. If you are a stockholder of record, then, yes, you can revoke your proxy at any time before the final vote at the Annual Meeting. You may revoke your proxy in any one of the following ways:

Your most current proxy card or telephone or Internet proxy is the one that is counted.

If you are a beneficial owner and your shares are held in “street name” by your broker, bank or other agent, you should follow the instructions provided by your broker, bank or other agent.

Votes will be counted by the inspector of election appointed for the Annual Meeting, who will separately count, (i) with respect to Proposal 1, votes “FOR,” “WITHHOLD” and broker non-votes; (ii) with respect to Proposal 2, votes “FOR,” “AGAINST,” abstentions and broker non-votes; and (iii) with respect to Proposal 3, votes “FOR,” “AGAINST” and abstentions.

The following table summarizes the minimum vote needed to approve each proposal and the effect of abstentions and broker non-votes.

A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a valid meeting. A quorum will be present if stockholders holding a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote are present at the Annual Meeting by virtual attendance or represented by proxy. On the Record Date, there were 132,830,946 shares of our Class A common stock and 101,137,893 shares of our Class B common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.

Your shares will be counted towards the quorum only if you submit a valid proxy (or one is submitted on your behalf by your broker, bank or other nominee) or if you vote online during the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted towards the quorum requirement. If there is no quorum, the holders of a majority of the voting power of shares present at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy may adjourn the Annual Meeting to another date.

Preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. In addition, final voting results will be published in a current report on Form 8-K that we expect to file within four business days after the Annual Meeting. If final voting results are not available to us in time to file a Form 8-K within four business days after the Annual Meeting, we intend to file a Form 8-K to publish preliminary results and, within four business days after the final results are known to us, file an additional Form 8-K to publish the final results.

We will pay for the entire cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to these proxy materials, our directors and employees also may solicit proxies in person, by telephone, or by other means of communication. Directors and employees will not be paid any additional compensation for soliciting proxies. We also may reimburse brokerage firms, banks and other agents for the cost of forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides for a classified board consisting of three classes of directors. Each class consists, as nearly as possible, of one-third of the total number of directors, and each class has a three-year term. Any additional directorships resulting from an increase in the number of directors will be distributed among the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class will consist of one-third of the directors. Vacancies on the board of directors may be filled only by persons elected by a majority of the remaining directors. A director elected by the board of directors to fill a vacancy in a class, including vacancies created by an increase in the number of directors, shall serve for the remainder of the full term of that class and until the director’s successor is duly elected and qualified. No decrease in the number of directors constituting the board of directors shall shorten the term of any incumbent director. The division of our board of directors into three classes with staggered three-year terms may delay or prevent a change of our management or a change in control of Sprinklr.

Our board of directors currently consists of nine members. At each annual meeting of stockholders, the successors to directors whose terms then expire will be elected to serve from the time of election until the third annual meeting following the election. There are three directors in Class II whose term of office expires in 2026. Neither Neeraj Agrawal nor Yvette Kanouff, each of whom is a Class II director as of the date of this proxy statement, is standing for reelection at the Annual Meeting. Our board of directors has approved a reduction in the number of directors constituting the board of directors from nine to seven, effective upon the resignation of Mr. Agrawal and Ms. Kanouff at the Annual Meeting.

Upon the recommendation of the nominating and corporate governance committee, our board of directors has nominated Stephen M. Ward, Jr. for election as a director at the Annual Meeting.

Mr. Ward currently is a member of our board of directors and has been nominated for re-election to serve as a Class II director. Mr. Ward was appointed by our board of directors on January 29, 2025 to fill a newly created directorship resulting from an increase in the number of directors constituting our board of directors. Mr. Ward was identified as a potential director nominee by a member of management.

Mr. Ward has agreed to stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting. Our management has no reason to believe that Mr. Ward will be unable to serve. If elected at the Annual Meeting, Mr. Ward would serve until the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in 2029 and until his successor has been duly elected and qualified, or, if sooner, until his death, resignation or removal. If Mr. Ward becomes unavailable for election as a result of an unexpected occurrence, shares that would have been voted for Mr. Ward will instead be voted for the election of a substitute nominee proposed by us.

Our board of directors seeks to assemble a board that, as a whole, possesses the appropriate balance of professional and industry knowledge, financial expertise, unique perspectives and high-level management experience necessary to oversee and direct our business. To that end, our nominating and corporate governance committee has identified and evaluated nominees in the broader context of the board’s overall composition, with the goal of recruiting members who possess relevant expertise and experience upon which to be able to offer advice and guidance to management, have sufficient time to devote to the affairs of Sprinklr, demonstrate excellence in their field, have the ability to exercise sound business judgment, have experience as a board member or executive officer of another publicly held company and have the commitment to rigorously represent the long-term interests of our stockholders.

There are no arrangements or understandings between any director and other person pursuant to which such director was selected as a member of our board of directors, except for Mr. Wasim, who was selected pursuant to a contractual right held by H&F Splash Holdings IX, L.P. See “Transactions with Related Persons—H&F Letter Agreement” for more information. The biographies below under “Information Regarding Director Nominee and Current Directors” include information, as of the date of this proxy statement, regarding the specific and particular experience, qualifications, attributes or skills of each director or director nominee that led our nominating and corporate governance committee to believe that the nominee should continue to serve on our board of directors.

Our board of directors recommends voting “FOR” the Class II director nominee named above, to hold office until our Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2029.

Our board of directors currently consists of nine members and is divided into three classes. Each class consists, as nearly as possible, of one-third of the total number of directors, and each class has a three-year term. At each annual meeting of stockholders, the successors to directors whose terms then expire will be elected to serve from the time of election until the third annual meeting following the election.

The following table sets forth, for the Class II nominee and our other directors, their ages and position or office held with us as of the date of this proxy statement:

Set forth below is biographical information for the director nominee and each of our other current directors. This includes information regarding each director’s experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led our board of directors to recommend him or her for board service.

Stephen M. Ward, Jr. has served as a member of our board of directors since January 2025. Mr. Ward is the former President and Chief Executive Officer of Lenovo Corporation, the international personal computer company formed by the acquisition of IBM’s personal computer division by Lenovo. Prior to joining Lenovo, Mr. Ward was IBM’s Chief Information Officer and General Manager of Thinkpad, as well as other business units. He currently sits on the boards of directors of C3.ai, Inc., where he serves as chair of its compensation committee and a member of its nominating and corporate governance committee, and Carpenter Technology Corporation, where he serves as the lead independent director, chair of its corporate governance committee and a member of both its human capital management committee and its science, technology and sustainability committee. Mr. Ward also currently sits on the board of directors of Molekule Inc., a private company. From November 2022 to October 2024, Mr. Ward served on the board of directors of Molekule Group, Inc., and from June 2021 to July 2022, he served on the board of directors of Vonage Holdings Corp. He also previously served on the boards of directors of KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc., E2Open Corporation, E-Ink Corporation, KLX Aerospace, QD Vision, Inc. and Lenovo. Mr. Ward holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. We believe that Mr. Ward is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors because of his extensive management experience in the technology industry and his significant leadership and service on other public company boards.

Rory Read has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of our board of directors since November 2024. Previously, Mr. Read served as the Chief Executive Officer of Vonage Holdings Corp. from July 2020 to March 2024. He also served as Senior Vice President at Ericsson from July 2022 to March 2024, having joined the company as part of Ericsson’s acquisition of Vonage. Prior to that, Mr. Read served in various roles at Dell Technologies, Inc. from April 2015 to June 2020, including most recently as its Chief Operating Executive, and as Chief Executive Officer and President of Virtustream, a Dell Technologies business from April 2018 to June 2020, and

Executive Vice President of Dell Boomi from Feb 2016 to June 2020. Prior to these roles, he served as Chief Executive Officer, President and a member of the board of directors of Advanced Micro Devices and Chief Operating Officer and President at Lenovo following 23 years at IBM. Mr. Read has served on the board of directors of Booz Allen Hamilton since January 2023. Mr. Read holds a B.S. in Information Systems from Hartwick College. We believe that Mr. Read is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors because of his extensive knowledge of the technology industry and software sector, as well as his extensive experience as a senior executive of a technology company, and his insight into corporate matters as our President and Chief Executive Officer.

Eileen Schloss has served as a member of our board of directors since January 2022. Ms. Schloss has served as an Operations Advisor to Advent International Corporation since December 2019. Prior to joining Advent, Ms. Schloss was the Executive Vice President, Human Resources and Real Estate for Medidata Solutions, Inc. from 2012 to March 2017. Ms. Schloss also has served as Executive Vice President, Human Resources for Rovi Corporation from 2007 to 2012, and as Vice President, Administration for Caspian Networks, Inc. from 2002 to 2006. Ms. Schloss currently serves on the board of directors of CCC Intelligent Solutions, Inc., where she is chair of the compensation committee. Ms. Schloss holds a B.S. in Organizational Behavior from the University of San Francisco and a M.S. in Technology Management from Pepperdine University. Ms. Schloss was named to National Association of Corporate Director (“NACD”) Directorship 100 in 2022, and, in March 2023, she obtained NACD’s Directorship Certification. We believe that Ms. Schloss is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors because of her extensive experience with acquisitions, divestitures, change initiatives and compensation decisions.

Tarim Wasim has served as a member of our board of directors since October 2020. Mr. Wasim is a Partner at Hellman & Friedman, where he focuses on the software, internet and services sectors. Mr. Wasim also serves as a member of the boards of directors of Checkmarx, Curriculum Associates and Zendesk. Mr. Wasim previously served on the boards of directors of AlixPartners, Baker Tilly, Internet Brands, Genesys, Renaissance Learning and SimpliSafe. Prior to joining Hellman & Friedman in 2005, Mr. Wasim was employed by Bain Capital and worked as a consultant at Bain & Company. He received an A.B. in Engineering from Dartmouth College and an M.B.A. from the Harvard Business School. We believe that Mr. Wasim is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors because of his extensive knowledge of the software sector, as well as his experience serving as a director of multiple Hellman & Friedman portfolio companies.

Jan R. Hauser has served as a member of our board of directors since January 2025. Ms. Hauser served in various capacities at the General Electric Company (“GE”) from April 2013 until March 2019, including as Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller. Prior to GE, Ms. Hauser was a partner in the national office of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), where she served as a senior technical resource on multiple topics. Early in her career, Ms. Hauser was selected for a two-year fellowship in the Office of the Chief Accountant at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Ms. Hauser currently sits on the board of directors of Magna International Inc., where she is a member of the audit committee and technology committee. She previously served on the boards of directors of Enfusion, Inc., from September 2021 to April 2025, Proterra Inc., from June 2022 to March 2024, and Vonage Holdings Corp., from October 2019 to July 2022. Ms. Hauser holds a B.B.A. in Accounting, summa cum laude, from the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater. We believe that Ms. Hauser is qualified to serve on our board of directors because of her extensive accounting and financial experience.

Kevin Haverty has served as a member of our board of directors since December 2022. From December 2011 to February 2024, Mr. Haverty served in various senior positions at ServiceNow Inc., including Chief Revenue Officer and most recently as Vice Chairman, Global Public Sector. From January 2010 to December 2011, Mr. Haverty served as Vice President, Americas Sales of the Backup Recovery Systems division of Dell EMC (formerly EMC Corporation). From June 2006 to January 2010, Mr. Haverty held senior positions at Data Domain (through its acquisition by EMC), including Vice President of Americas Sales. Mr. Haverty holds a B.A. degree in Political Science from Providence College and was a US Army ROTC Distinguished Military Graduate. He served ten years in the US Army National Guard and is a veteran of the Gulf War, Operation Desert Storm. We believe that Mr. Haverty is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors because of his extensive knowledge of the technology industry, including his role in senior positions at a major software company.

Ragy Thomas has served as Chairman of our board of directors since founding Sprinklr in September 2009. Mr. Thomas has served as the Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer of UnifyApps since October 2025. Previously, Mr. Thomas served at Sprinklr as Advisor to the Chief Executive Officer from November 2024 to May 2025, Co-Chief Executive

Officer from June 2024 to November 2024 and Chief Executive Officer from September 2009 to June 2024. Prior to that, Mr. Thomas held various positions with Epsilon, a division of Alliance Data Systems Corp. now owned by Publicis Groupe, where he was most recently the president of interactive services from September 2006 to June 2008. From 2001 to 2005, Mr. Thomas also was the chief technology officer of Bigfoot Interactive, an email communications company acquired by Epsilon. Mr. Thomas earned an M.B.A. in Finance and Information Systems from the New York University Leonard N. Stern School of Business and a Computer Science Engineering degree from Pondicherry University in India. We believe that Mr. Thomas is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors because of his experience building and leading businesses and his insight into corporate matters as our Founder and Chairman.

Neeraj Agrawal has served as a member of our board of directors since August 2011. Mr. Agrawal is a General Partner at Battery Ventures, a global technology-focused investment firm, where he has worked since August 2000. Mr. Agrawal serves on the board of directors of several private technology companies, including Dataiku, Inc., Pendo, Inc., Tealium, Inc. and Workato, Inc. He is a member of the board of directors of Braze, Inc. and was previously a member of the boards of directors of Amplitude, Inc., Bazaarvoice, Inc., Coupa Software Incorporated, Marketo, Inc. and Wayfair, Inc. Mr. Agrawal holds a B.S. in Computer Science from Cornell University and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. We believe that Mr. Agrawal is qualified to serve as a director based on his extensive business experience in the software and web services industries, his experience in venture capital and his service as a director of various public and private companies.

Yvette Kanouff has served as a member of our board of directors since August 2018. Ms. Kanouff also has been a Partner at JC2 Ventures LLC since July 2019, where she also serves as advisor and board member to various private companies. She previously held various positions at Cisco Systems, Inc. from June 2014 to June 2019 and was most recently senior vice president and general manager of its service provider business. Prior to joining Cisco, Ms. Kanouff served in executive positions at Cablevision Systems, SeaChange International, and Time Warner Cable. She serves on the public boards of Amdocs Limited, Entegris, Inc. and Science Applications International Corp. She holds a B.S. and M.S. in Mathematics and a D.Sc. h.c. from the University of Central Florida and received her Corporate Director Certificate from Harvard Business School in 2022. We believe that Ms. Kanouff is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors because she has more than 20 years of service provider, media and software experience.

The graphic below identifies certain key experience and skills possessed by our directors continuing after the Annual Meeting.

Our Class A common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). Under the NYSE listing standards, a majority of the members of our board of directors must qualify as “independent,” as affirmatively determined by our board of directors. Our board of directors consults with our counsel to ensure that its determinations are consistent with relevant securities and other laws and regulations regarding the definition of “independent,” including those set forth in pertinent listing standards of NYSE, as in effect from time to time.

Our nominating and corporate governance committee undertook its annual review of director independence and made a recommendation to our board of directors regarding director independence. As a result of this review, our board of directors affirmatively determined that Mses. Hauser, Kanouff and Schloss and Messrs. Agrawal, Haverty, Ward and Wasim are “independent” in accordance with NYSE listing standards applicable to boards of directors in general, and that Edwin Gillis, who left our board of directors during 2025, was “independent” during the period he served on our board of directors during 2025. In addition, our board of directors has affirmatively determined that Ms. Hauser and Messrs. Agrawal and Wasim are “independent” in accordance with the NYSE listing standards and SEC rules applicable to audit committee members, and that Ms. Schloss and Messrs. Haverty, Ward and Wasim are “independent” in accordance with the NYSE listing standards and SEC rules applicable to compensation committee members.

In making this determination, our board of directors found that none of these directors has or had any relationships that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director, taking into account certain relationships and transactions that occurred in the ordinary course of business between Sprinklr and entities with which some of our directors are or have been affiliated and all other facts and circumstances that our board of directors deemed relevant in determining their independence, including their beneficial ownership of our capital stock. Mr. Read is not independent due to his position as our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Thomas is not independent due to his former positions at Sprinklr as Advisor to the Chief Executive Officer from November 2024 to May 2025, Co-Chief Executive Officer from June 2024 to November 2024 and Chief Executive Officer from September 2009 to June 2024.

Our nominating and corporate governance committee regularly reviews external perspectives and corporate governance trends, including the voting policies of the major proxy advisory firms, input received from stockholder engagement and advice from outside advisors, but believes that there is no single governance approach that suits all companies. We believe that the key consideration in determining whether to maintain a particular governance practice is whether that practice promotes the best interests of our stockholders. We believe that the following continue to protect our interests and those of our stockholders:

Our board of directors is chaired by our Founder, Mr. Thomas. As board chair, Mr. Thomas presides at all meetings of our stockholders and our board of directors and holds such other powers and carries out such other duties as are customarily carried out by a board chair. As President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Read focuses on developing the overall strategic direction of our company, delivering on such strategy and overseeing our day-to-day business. Our board of directors also has appointed Ms. Schloss as our lead independent director.

Our board of directors has determined that it is in the best interests of our company and our stockholders to separate the positions of chief executive officer and board chair. Our board of directors does not believe that there should be a fixed rule regarding the positions of chief executive officer and board chair being held by different individuals, or whether the chair should be an employee or should be elected from among the non-employee directors. The needs of our company and the individuals available to assume these roles may require different outcomes at different times, and our board of directors believes that retaining flexibility in these decisions is in the best interests of our company and our stockholders. Our board of directors will continue to periodically review our leadership structure and may make such changes in the future as it deems appropriate.

Our board of directors has appointed Ms. Schloss as the lead independent director to help reinforce the independence of the board of directors as a whole. The position of lead independent director has been structured to serve as an effective balance to an employee board chair. In addition to the duties of all directors, the specific responsibilities of the lead independent director are to: (i) work with Mr. Read to develop and approve an appropriate meeting schedule for the board; (ii) work with Mr. Read to develop and approve board meeting agendas; (iii) provide Mr. Read feedback on the quality, quantity, and timeliness of the information provided to the board; (iv) develop the agenda and moderate executive sessions of the independent members of the board; (v) preside over board meetings when Mr. Thomas is not present or when the performance or compensation of Mr. Read or the board is discussed; (vi) act as principal liaison between the independent members of the board and Mr. Read; (vii) convene meetings of the independent directors as appropriate; (viii) be available for consultation and direct communication with stockholders as deemed appropriate; and (ix) perform other duties as the board may determine from time to time. As a result, we believe that the lead independent director can help ensure the effective independent functioning of the board of directors in its oversight responsibilities. In addition, we believe that the lead independent director is better positioned to build a consensus among directors and to serve as a conduit between the other independent directors and Mr. Read, for example, by facilitating the inclusion on meeting agendas of matters of concern to the independent directors.

One of the key functions of our board of directors is informed oversight of our risk management process. Our board of directors does not have a standing risk management committee, but rather administers this oversight function directly through the board of directors as a whole, as well as through various standing committees of the board of directors that address risks inherent in their respective areas of oversight. In particular, our board of directors is responsible for monitoring and assessing strategic risk exposure, including a determination of the nature and level of risk appropriate for our company. The involvement of our full board of directors in reviewing our business is an integral aspect of its assessment of management’s tolerance for risk and also its determination of what constitutes an appropriate level of risk.

While our full board of directors has overall responsibility for risk oversight, it has delegated oversight of certain risks to its committees. Our audit committee monitors our major financial risk exposures and the steps our management has taken to monitor and control these exposures, including guidelines and policies to govern the process by which risk assessment and management is undertaken. Furthermore, our audit committee oversees risks associated with information security, including cybersecurity and data privacy, and regularly reviews with management our information security programs and assessment, management and mitigation of such risk. Further, our audit committee also monitors compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, in addition to oversight of the performance of our internal audit function. Our compensation committee monitors whether any of our compensation policies and programs has the potential to encourage excessive risk-taking. Our nominating and corporate governance committee oversees our major corporate governance risks, including through monitoring the effectiveness of our corporate governance guidelines and reviewing and considering environmental, social responsibility and sustainability matters.

At periodic meetings of our board of directors and its committees, management reports to and seeks guidance from our board and its committees with respect to the most significant risks that could affect our business, such as legal risks, information security and privacy risks, and financial, tax and audit-related risks. In addition, among other matters, management provides to our audit committee periodic reports on our compliance programs and investment policy and practices.

Our board of directors is responsible for the oversight of management and the strategy of our company and for establishing corporate policies. Our board of directors meets periodically during the year to review significant developments affecting us and to act on matters requiring the approval of our board of directors. Our board of directors met seven times during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2026. With respect to the committees of our board of directors, the audit committee met six times during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2026, the compensation committee met seven times, and the nominating and corporate governance committee met four times. During the fiscal year ended January 31, 2026, each director attended 75% or more of the aggregate of the meetings of our board of directors and of the committees on which he or she served. We encourage our directors and nominee(s) for director to attend our Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

As required by our Corporate Governance Guidelines and applicable NYSE listing standards, our independent, non-management directors meet periodically in executive session at least twice per year and at such other times as the directors deem necessary or appropriate. Ms. Schloss, our lead independent director, presides over the executive sessions and serve as the liaison between the independent directors and our chief executive officer. In addition, each of our standing committees regularly meets at similar executive sessions, at which the respective committee chairs preside.

Our board of directors has established a standing audit committee, a compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee. Effective as of the close of our Annual Meeting, our strategy committee (previously ad hoc) will become a standing committee. Our board of directors may establish other committees to facilitate the management of our business. Our board of directors has adopted a written charter for each of our audit, compensation, and nominating and corporate governance committees, each of which is available to stockholders on our investor relations website at investors.sprinklr.com.

The following table provides current membership information for each of the standing committees of our board of directors:

 

Each of the committees has the authority to engage legal counsel or other experts or consultants, as it deems appropriate to carry out its responsibilities. Our board of directors has determined that each member of each standing committee meets the applicable NYSE rules and regulations regarding “independence,” and each member is free of any relationship that would impair such member’s individual exercise of independent judgment with regard to us.

Below is a description of each standing committee of our board of directors:

Our audit committee consists of Ms. Hauser and Messrs. Agrawal and Wasim. As of the Annual Meeting and following Mr. Agrawal’s resignation as a director, our audit committee will consist of Ms. Hauser and Messrs. Ward and Wasim. Our board of directors has determined that each member satisfies the independence requirements under NYSE listing standards and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Ms. Hauser serves as the chair of our audit committee. In addition, Mr. Gillis served as the chair of our audit committee until March 31, 2025 and as a member of our audit committee until his resignation from our board of directors and such position as of the close of business on June 12, 2025. Our board of directors has determined that Ms. Hauser is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of SEC regulations. Each member of our audit committee can read and understand fundamental financial statements in accordance with applicable requirements. In arriving at these determinations, our board of directors has examined each audit committee member’s scope of experience and the nature of such member’s employment in the corporate finance sector.

The primary purpose of the audit committee is to discharge the responsibilities of our board of directors with respect to our corporate accounting and financial reporting processes, systems of internal control and financial statement audits, and to oversee our independent registered public accounting firm. Specific responsibilities of our audit committee include:

The audit committee has reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2026 with our management. The audit committee also has reviewed and discussed with KPMG LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”). The audit committee also has received the written disclosures from KPMG LLP required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountants’ communications with the audit committee concerning independence and has discussed with KPMG LLP the accounting firm’s independence. Based on the foregoing, the audit committee has recommended to our board of directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2026 and filed with the SEC.

Sprinklr, Inc.

Audit Committee

Neeraj Agrawal

Jan R. Hauser

Tarim Wasim

The material in this report is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed “filed” with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference in any filing of Sprinklr under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.

Our compensation committee consists of Ms. Schloss and Messrs. Haverty, Ward and Wasim. Mr. Wasim serves as the chair of our compensation committee. Our board of directors has determined that each member is independent under NYSE listing standards and a “non-employee director” as defined in Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act.

The primary purpose of our compensation committee is to discharge the responsibilities of our board of directors in overseeing our compensation policies, plans and programs and to review and determine the compensation to be paid to our executive officers, directors and other senior management, as appropriate. Specific responsibilities of our compensation committee include:

The compensation committee generally meets quarterly and with greater frequency if necessary. The compensation committee also acts periodically by unanimous written consent in lieu of a formal meeting. The agenda for each meeting is usually developed by the chairperson of the compensation committee, in consultation with management.

The compensation committee meets regularly in executive session. From time to time, however, various members of management and other employees, as well as outside advisors or consultants, may be invited by the compensation

committee to make presentations, to provide financial or other background information or advice or to otherwise participate in compensation committee meetings. Our chief executive officer may not participate in, or be present during, any deliberations or determinations of the compensation committee regarding his compensation.

The charter of the compensation committee grants the compensation committee full access to all books, records, facilities and personnel of Sprinklr. In addition, under the charter, the compensation committee has the authority to obtain, at our expense, advice and assistance from compensation consultants and internal and external legal, accounting or other advisors and other external resources that the compensation committee considers necessary or appropriate in the performance of its duties. The compensation committee has direct responsibility for the oversight of the work of any consultants or advisers engaged for the purpose of advising the compensation committee. In particular, the compensation committee has the authority to retain compensation consultants to assist in its evaluation of executive and director compensation, including the authority to approve the consultant’s reasonable fees and other retention terms.

No member of our compensation committee currently is one of our officers or employees. None of our executive officers currently serves, or has served during the last year, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of our board of directors or compensation committee.

Our nominating and corporate governance committee consists of Mses. Kanouff and Schloss and Mr. Agrawal. As of the Annual Meeting and following Ms. Kanouff’s and Mr. Agrawal’s resignations as directors, our nominating and corporate governance committee will consist of Ms. Schloss and Mr. Haverty. The chair of our nominating and corporate governance committee is Ms. Schloss. Our board of directors has determined that each member of the nominating and corporate governance committee is independent under NYSE listing standards.

Specific responsibilities of our nominating and corporate governance committee include:

The charter of the nominating and corporate governance committee grants the nominating and corporate governance committee full access to all books, records, facilities and personnel of Sprinklr. In addition, under the charter, if the nominating and corporate governance committee concludes that it must retain legal, accounting or other outside advisors, it may independently do so, at our expense. Further, the nominating and corporate governance committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate executive search firms to help identify and/or evaluate director candidates.

The nominating and corporate governance committee believes that candidates for director should have certain minimum qualifications, including the highest personal integrity and ethics, the ability to read and understand basic financial statements and being older than 21. The nominating and corporate governance committee also intends to consider such factors as possessing relevant expertise upon which to be able to offer advice and guidance to

management, having sufficient time to devote to our affairs, demonstrated excellence in such person’s field, having the ability to exercise sound business judgment, experience as a board member or executive officer of another publicly held company, having a unique personal background, perspective and experience, and having the commitment to rigorously represent the long-term interests of our stockholders. These qualifications may be modified from time to time. Candidates for director nominees are reviewed in the context of the current composition of the board of directors, the operating requirements of Sprinklr and the long-term interests of our stockholders. In conducting this assessment, the nominating and corporate governance committee typically considers differences in life experience, background, lifestyle preference, age and other factors as it deems appropriate, given the current needs of the board of directors and our business, to maintain a balance of knowledge, experience and capability.

In the case of incumbent directors whose terms of office are set to expire, the nominating and corporate governance committee reviews these directors’ overall service to Sprinklr during their terms, including the number of meetings attended, level of participation, quality of performance and any other relationships and transactions that might impair the directors’ independence. In the case of new director candidates, our nominating and corporate governance committee also evaluates whether the nominee is independent for NYSE purposes, based upon applicable NYSE listing standards, applicable SEC rules and regulations and the advice of counsel, if necessary. Our nominating and corporate governance committee conducts any appropriate and necessary inquiries into the backgrounds and qualifications of possible candidates after considering the function and needs of our board of directors. Our nominating and corporate governance committee meets to discuss and consider the candidates’ qualifications and then selects a nominee for recommendation to our board of directors.

Our nominating and corporate governance committee will consider stockholder recommendations of director candidates, so long as they comply with applicable law and our amended and restated bylaws (“Bylaws”), which procedures are summarized below, and will review the qualifications of any such candidate in accordance with the criteria described in the two preceding paragraphs. Stockholders who wish to recommend individuals for consideration by our nominating and corporate governance committee to become nominees for election to our board of directors should do so by delivering a timely written notice to our Secretary. See “Other Information for Stockholders—Stockholder Proposals for the 2027 Annual Meeting of Stockholders” for additional information.

As of our Annual Meeting, our strategy committee will consist of Ms. Schloss and Messrs. Ward and Wasim. The chair of our strategy committee is expected to be Mr. Ward.

Specific responsibilities of our strategy committee will include:

Our relationship with our stockholders is an important part of our corporate governance program. Engaging with stockholders helps us to understand how they view us, to set goals and expectations for our performance, and to identify emerging issues that may affect our strategies, corporate governance, compensation practices or other aspects of our operations. Our stockholder and investor outreach includes investor road shows, analyst meetings, and investor conferences and meetings. We also communicate with stockholders and other stakeholders through various media, including our annual report and SEC filings, proxy statement, news releases and our website. Our webcasts for quarterly earnings releases are open to all. These webcasts are available in real time and are archived on our website for a period of time.

Interested parties wishing to communicate with our board of directors or an individual director may do so by sending a written communication to the board of directors or such director c/o 441 9^th Ave., 12^th Floor, New York, NY 10001, Attention: Secretary. The Secretary will review each communication. The Secretary will forward such communication to the board of directors or to any individual director to whom the communication is addressed unless the communication contains advertisements or solicitations or is unduly hostile, threatening or similarly inappropriate, in which case the Secretary will discard the communication or inform the proper authorities, as may be appropriate.

Our board of directors has adopted the Sprinklr, Inc. Code of Conduct and Ethics that applies to all officers, directors and employees. The Code of Conduct and Ethics is available on our website at investors.sprinklr.com. If we make any substantive amendments to the Code of Conduct and Ethics or grant any waiver from a provision of the Code of Conduct and Ethics to any director or our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, we will promptly disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver on our website rather than by filing a Current Report on Form 8-K.

Our board of directors has adopted the Sprinklr, Inc. Corporate Governance Guidelines for the conduct and operation of the board in order to give directors a flexible framework for effectively pursuing our objectives for the benefit of our stockholders. The Corporate Governance Guidelines set forth the practices that the board of directors intends to follow with respect to board composition and selection, board meetings and involvement of senior management, chief executive officer performance evaluation, management succession planning, board committees and director compensation. The Corporate Governance Guidelines may be viewed on our website at investors.sprinklr.com.

Our board of directors has adopted the Sprinklr, Inc. Insider Trading Policy (the “Insider Trading Policy”), governing the purchase, sale, and/or other dispositions of our securities by directors, executive officers, employees and certain other persons. We believe that the Insider Trading Policy is reasonably designed to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules and regulations and applicable NYSE listing standards. From time to time, we have engaged in transactions in our securities. It is our policy to comply with applicable laws and regulations relating to insider trading. A copy of the Insider Trading Policy is filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2026.

Our stockholders are entitled to vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with SEC rules. After careful consideration, and taking into consideration the say-on-frequency vote that occurred at the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders, our board of directors has determined that a say-on-pay vote that occurs every year is the most appropriate alternative for the Company at this time.

This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement. The compensation of our named executive officers subject to the vote is disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the related narrative disclosure contained in this proxy statement. As discussed in those disclosures, we believe that our compensation policies and decisions are (i) focused on pay-for-performance principles, (ii) strongly aligned with our stockholders’ interests and (iii) consistent with current market practices. The compensation of our named executive officers is designed to enable us to attract and retain talented and experienced executives to lead us successfully in a competitive environment.

Accordingly, our board of directors is asking the stockholders to indicate their support for the compensation of our named executive officers as described in this proxy statement by casting a non-binding advisory vote “FOR” the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.”

Because the vote is advisory, it is not binding on our board of directors or our compensation committee. Nevertheless, the views expressed by the stockholders, whether through this vote or otherwise, are important to management and our board of directors and, accordingly, our board of directors or our compensation committee intend to consider the results of this vote in making determinations in the future regarding executive compensation arrangements.

Our board of directors recommends voting “FOR” the approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis, of the resolution on named executive officer compensation.

The following table sets forth, for our executive officers, their ages and position held with us as of the date of this proxy statement:

Biographical information for Rory Read is included above with the director biographies under the caption “Information Regarding Director Nominee and Current Directors.”

Anthony Coletta has served as our Chief Financial Officer since October 2025. Prior to joining Sprinklr, Mr. Coletta served as Chief Investor Relations Officer at SAP SE (“SAP”) from October 2021 to June 2024, where he was responsible for leading the financial markets communication for the group. From July 2006 to October 2021, Mr. Coletta served in numerous other roles at SAP, including as Chief Financial Officer of SAP North America, Chief Financial Officer of SAP Latin America & Caribbean, Chief Financial Officer of Market Units, and Chief Controlling Officer of Global Sales, Global Customer Operations. Prior to his SAP career, Mr. Coletta held various leadership positions in finance and strategy at Siemens and ThyssenKrupp. Mr. Coletta has extensive international professional experience, including in Europe, Latin America and the U.S. Mr. Coletta holds a master’s degree in Economics & Applied Languages from Paris I Sorbonne University.

Joy Corso has served as our Chief Administrative Officer since January 2025, leading global Culture & Talent, Marketing and Communications, and key transformation initiatives. With over 25 years of business experience, she brings a strong background in driving operational rigor and cultural transformation, as well as broad business transformation experience. Previously, Ms. Corso served as Chief Marketing Officer at Vonage Holdings Corp. (“Vonage”) from July 2020 to December 2024, where she was responsible for leading the company’s Marketing, Communications, Integration and Transformation teams and serving as President of the Vonage Foundation, the charitable outreach arm of Vonage. Ms. Corso holds both an M.B.A. and a B.S. in Business Administration from Providence College.

Sanjay Macwan has served as our Chief Information Officer since April 2025. Mr. Macwan most recently served as the Chief Information Officer and Chief Information Security Officer of Vonage from July 2018 to January 2025. Previously, he served as Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer, Media Labs at NBCUniversal, Inc. from January 2014 to August 2017. Prior to that, Mr. Macwan served in various roles at AT&T, Inc. from July 1992 to January 2014, including most recently as Vice President, AT&T Chief Technology Office. Mr. Macwan holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and an M.S. in Computer Science from Polytechnic University (current NYU Tandon School of Engineering) in New York.

Amitabh Misra has served as our Chief Technology Officer since April 2024. Prior to joining Sprinklr, Mr. Misra was Vice President of Engineering at Adobe Inc. from November 2018 to March 2024, where he led a global R&D organization for Adobe’s Experience Cloud Platform, including engineers, product leaders, and AI/ML researchers. Prior to Adobe, Mr. Misra was the Founder and CEO of GOFro.com and CTO, chief architect and head of engineering at Snapdeal.com. Mr. Misra holds a BTech degree from the Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur and an M.B.A. from the University of California at Berkeley.

Jacob Scott has served as our General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since March 2023. Mr. Scott previously served as our Deputy General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer from November 2020 to March 2023. Prior to that, Mr. Scott served in various roles at Athenahealth, Inc., most recently as Assistant General Counsel from July 2017 to November 2020. Mr. Scott holds a B.A. in English and American Studies from Williams College and a J.D. from Yale Law School.

Karthik Suri has served as our Chief Product and Corporate Strategy Officer since October 2025. Prior to joining Sprinklr, Mr. Suri served as Chief Product Officer at Cornerstone OnDemand Inc. from September 2022 to

October 2025, where he led global product strategy and management, design and delivery and had general management responsibilities for some of its high growth business units. From June 2020 to September 2022, Mr. Suri served as Chief Product & Technology Officer at Invitae Corporation, where he led the global products and technology organization. Prior to that, Mr. Suri held strategic leadership roles at GE Digital, PayPal, eBay, Magento, Yahoo! And Barclays following his early career at GE. Mr. Suri has served on the board of directors for Junior Achievement of Northern California since June 2018. Mr. Suri previously served on the World Economic Forum’s Digital Platform and Ecosystems Executive Steering Group. Mr. Suri holds a B.E. in Mechanical Engineering and an M.Sc. in Chemistry from BITS, Pilani, India, an M.S. in Industrial and Systems Engineering from The Ohio State University, and a dual M.B.A. from Columbia Business School and University of California, Berkeley, Haas School of Business.

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides an overview of our executive compensation philosophy, the overall objectives of our executive compensation program, how each element of our executive compensation program is designed to satisfy those objectives, the policies underlying our executive compensation program for our fiscal year ended January 31, 2026 (our “fiscal year 2026”), and the compensation awarded to our fiscal year 2026 named executive officers (“NEOs”) listed below:

During fiscal year 2026, we made the following changes to our executive officers:

For additional information regarding the employment agreements with each of Messrs. Macwan, Millard, Coletta and Suri, please see Exhibits Number 10.22 through 10.26 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2026, filed with the SEC on March 19, 2026. For additional information regarding the Transition, Separation and Release of Claims Agreement with Mr. Sarin, please see the section below titled, “Transition Agreement with Mr. Sarin.”

The following discussion and analysis of compensation arrangements of our NEOs should be read together with the compensation tables and related disclosures.

We are committed to sound executive compensation policies and practices, as highlighted in the following table:

The main objectives of our executive compensation program are to:

We believe that our executive compensation program design features accomplish the following:

Our compensation committee uses its judgment to establish a target total direct compensation opportunity for each executive officer that reflects a balanced mix of current, short-term incentive and long-term incentive compensation, and cash and non-cash compensation that it believes appropriate to achieve the goals of our executive compensation program and our key business objectives. Further, a significant portion of each executive officer’s total target direct compensation opportunity consists of a short-term performance-based annual cash bonus opportunity and long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards to align the executive officers’ incentives with the interests of our stockholders and our long-term corporate goals. Our compensation committee will continue to evaluate our compensation strategy as we continue to evolve and grow as a public company.

Our compensation committee is appointed by our board of directors to assist with the board’s oversight responsibilities with respect to our compensation and benefit plans, policies and programs, administration of our equity plans, and the board’s responsibilities related to the compensation of our executive officers, non-employee directors, and senior management, as appropriate.

Our compensation committee is primarily responsible for establishing and reviewing our general compensation strategy. It oversees and evaluates our executive compensation program and generally determines, which may be subject to final board of directors approval, the principal components of compensation (base salary, annual performance-based cash bonus awards, and long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards) for our executive officers on an annual basis; however, decisions may occur at other times for new hires, promotions or other special circumstances as our compensation committee determines appropriate, such as to encourage retention. Our compensation committee does not delegate authority to approve executive officer compensation and has full authority to make all compensation decisions.

Generally, our compensation committee’s process for determining executive compensation is comprised of two related elements: the determination of compensation levels and the approval of performance objectives for the current year. In making executive compensation decisions, our compensation committee generally considers each executive officer’s total target direct compensation (consisting of base salary, target total cash compensation, and long-term incentive compensation in the form of equity awards, valued based on an approximation of grant date fair value). For executive officers other than our chief executive officer, the compensation committee solicits and considers performance assessments and recommendations submitted to the compensation committee by our chief executive officer for each of these compensation components and other compensation-related matters. While our chief executive officer provided recommendations and discussed them with our compensation committee, he does not participate in our compensation committee’s deliberations concerning, or the determination of, his own compensation. The evaluation of the performance of our chief executive officer is conducted by the compensation committee, which determines any adjustment to his compensation, as well as equity awards to be granted. For all executive officers and non-employee directors, as part of its deliberations, the compensation committee may review and consider, as appropriate, materials such as financial reports and projections, operational data, executive and director stock ownership information, company stock performance data, analyses of historical executive compensation levels and current company-wide

compensation levels and recommendations of the compensation committee’s compensation consultant, including competitive market analyses of executive and non-employee director compensation paid at other companies identified by the consultant.

Our compensation committee also works with and receives information and analyses from other members of management, including within our legal, finance, and human resources departments, and considers such information and analyses in determining the structure and amount of compensation to be paid to our executive officers, including our NEOs. Members of management are not present during discussions regarding their own compensation.

Our compensation committee focuses on providing a competitive compensation package that provides significant short- and long-term incentives for the achievement of measurable corporate objectives. We believe that this approach provides an appropriate blend of short- and long-term incentives to maximize stockholder value creation.

Each year, our compensation committee conducts a review of our executive compensation program to determine if any changes are necessary or appropriate. In carrying out its responsibilities, our compensation committee evaluates our compensation policies and practices for alignment with our executive compensation philosophy, develops compensation-related strategies and makes decisions that it believes further our philosophy and/or align with compensation best practices. Our compensation committee does not establish a specific target for formulating the target annual total direct compensation opportunities for our executives, including our NEOs. Instead, in consultation with its compensation consultant, our compensation committee weighs various considerations, including our executive compensation program philosophy and objectives; each individual executive’s knowledge, skills, experience, qualifications and tenure; the scope of each individual executive’s title, role and responsibilities; the performance of each individual executive, based on a subjective assessment of such executive’s contributions, potential to lead our overall performance and ability to lead such executive’s business unit or function, and as measured against various financial, operational and strategic objectives in such executive’s area of expertise and responsibility; retention risk (and related replacement cost); compensation parity among our executives; an analysis of competitive market data; and the recommendation of our chief executive officer (except with respect to his own compensation).

Our compensation committee has retained Compensia as its independent compensation consultant since fiscal year 2020 due to its extensive compensation-related analytical expertise relating to technology companies. Compensia reports directly to our compensation committee and does not provide any services to our company other than competitive market data and advice related to executive and non-employee director compensation matters. Our compensation committee has evaluated whether the work of Compensia as its compensation consultant raised any conflict of interest, considering relevant factors in accordance with the guidelines established by the SEC and the listing standards of the NYSE. Based on this review, our compensation committee determined that the work of Compensia and its individual compensation advisors has not raised any conflicts of interest or impaired its independence.

In its capacity as our compensation committee’s independent compensation consultant, in fiscal year 2026, Compensia assisted with, among other things:

Our compensation committee has the sole authority to engage and terminate Compensia’s services, as well as to approve its compensation. Compensia provides competitive market analyses and advises our compensation committee but has no authority to make compensation decisions on behalf of our compensation committee or Sprinklr. Compensia reports to our compensation committee and has direct access to the chairperson and the other members of our compensation committee.

Our compensation committee believes that it is important when making compensation decisions to be informed as to the current practices of comparable public companies with which we compete for top talent. To this end, our compensation committee works annually with Compensia to review and update the companies in our compensation peer group to be used in connection with assessing compensation practices and pay levels. Our compensation committee believes that the peer group and broader market data analyzed by Compensia, along with such other factors as internal parity, scope and complexity of role, experience, skills and qualifications, performance, and the retentive value of unvested equity holdings, are important reference points when setting compensation for our NEOs because competition for skilled executives is intense in our industry and the retention of our talented leadership team is critical to our success.

Our compensation committee reviews our compensation peer group on an annual basis in advance of making compensation decisions for the upcoming fiscal year. Changes to the peer group are made as the compensation committee determines to be appropriate, taking into consideration various financial criteria (with a focus on revenue and market capitalization), business focus, and recent merger and acquisition activity. The primary criteria used for screening companies for inclusion in the fiscal year 2026 compensation peer group were the following:

The group of proposed peer companies was further refined after taking into consideration positive profitability, revenue growth and input from management. After considering the above criteria, for purposes of the fiscal year 2026 compensation peer group, eight companies were removed from, and seven companies were added to, the fiscal year 2025 compensation peer group. Accordingly, in November 2024, our compensation committee approved the following compensation peer group for fiscal year 2026:

At our 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (our “2025 Annual Meeting”), our stockholders approved our advisory vote on named executive officer compensation (the “Say-on-Pay proposal”), with 95.6% of the votes cast in favor of the Say-on-Pay proposal. Despite the favorable vote, in recognition of the feedback received from stockholders and their advisors in connection with and following the 2025 Annual Meeting, our compensation committee determined to address a number of the issues raised about various aspects of our executive compensation program, including changing the structure of our annual cash bonus plan. Further, as previously disclosed, Mr. Read was not granted any equity awards in fiscal year 2026, consistent with the terms of his employment agreement.

Our compensation committee continues to believe that, inclusive of these changes, its general approach to executive compensation is reasonable and appropriate. Our compensation committee will continue to consider the results of future say-on-pay votes and ongoing stockholder feedback to help ensure that our executive compensation program is effective and efficient in serving the interests of the Company and our stockholders. Following the Annual Meeting to which this proxy statement relates, our next Say-on-Pay proposal will be presented for consideration by our stockholders at our 2027 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

To achieve our compensation objectives, we provide our executive officers, including our NEOs, with a compensation package consisting of the following elements:

Generally, the base salaries of our executive officers, including our NEOs, are reviewed annually by our compensation committee and adjusted as appropriate. In setting base salaries, our compensation committee considers several factors, including, but not limited to, the factors set forth in the section above titled, “How We Determine Executive Compensation—Setting Executive Compensation.” In fiscal year 2026, our compensation committee took the following actions with respect to the base salaries of our NEOs:

The fiscal year 2026 ending base salaries of our NEOs are reflected below.

The 2026 Bonus Plan generally provides to our eligible senior executives, including our NEOs, an opportunity to earn annual cash bonus awards contingent upon the attainment of specific, pre-established, quantitative performance goals as determined by our compensation committee. Eligible executives are assigned a portion of the total bonus pool, with the total bonus pool determined by our compensation committee based on our achievement of preestablished corporate financial performance metrics. The funding of the bonus pool, as a percentage of the target bonus pool, is the “corporate funding factor.” Each bonus payout is then prorated for compensation changes, if any, and time in the Bonus Plan during the fiscal year. If the corporate performance goals are met, our compensation committee will determine if incentive payments are to be made and at what level by individual as soon as practicable thereafter.

Our compensation committee generally reviews our executive officers’ target annual cash bonus opportunities (calculated as a percentage of base salary) annually at the beginning of the fiscal year. In determining the target annual cash bonus opportunities for our executive officers, our compensation committee considers various factors, including the scope of each executive officer’s role and responsibilities, internal parity, a competitive market analysis prepared by Compensia and the recommendations of our chief executive officer (except with respect to his own target annual cash bonus opportunity).

In March 2025, our compensation committee reviewed the target annual cash bonus opportunities of our then-serving NEOs, Ms. Corso and Messrs. Read and Sarin, and determined to leave them unchanged. The target annual cash bonus opportunities for our NEOs, expressed as a percentage of their annual base salary, were as follows:

As noted above, at the time of approving the 2026 Bonus Plan, our compensation committee selected net new annualized recurring revenue bookings and non-GAAP operating income as the corporate performance goals for fiscal year 2026. At that time, our compensation committee chose these metrics because it believed that those goals were appropriate indicators of our successful execution of our near-term strategic objectives. However, after extensive discussions with Mr. Read, who, at the time that the goals were established, was early in his role as our Chief Executive Officer, and other members of senior management, our compensation committee determined that, based on Mr. Read’s focus and execution objectives relative to our strategic plan, total revenue was a more meaningful metric for measuring our progress against our fiscal year 2026 annual operating plan than net new annualized recurring revenue bookings. Further, because we provide annual public guidance regarding revenue performance, our compensation committee believed that using revenue would better enable investors to assess our performance relative to expectations. Accordingly, our compensation committee determined to replace net new annualized recurring revenue bookings with total revenue and to continue to use non-GAAP operating income as the other financial performance metric under the 2026 Bonus Plan, with each metric equally weighted. Our compensation committee did not view this change as a reduction in goal rigor. Rather, as approved, the revenue goals adopted required performance meaningfully above our annual guidance to achieve a target payout and required meaningful improvement over our fiscal year 2025 actual revenue performance.

Total revenue is an indicator of the overall health of our business and our future outlook, while non-GAAP operating income is an indicator of bottom-line rigor and our path to profitability. Non-GAAP operating income (which is defined below) should not be construed as an alternative to earnings from operations, net earnings or operating cash flow.

Each of the annual corporate performance goals, their relative weightings and payout methodology are summarized in the chart below. Per the terms of the 2026 Bonus Plan, each executive’s bonus amount is determined based on

multiplying base salary, prorated for compensation changes, if any, and time eligible to participate in the Bonus Plan, times the corporate funding factor ranging from 50% to 200%.

Our compensation committee assessed the corporate performance goal achievement following the end of fiscal year 2026. In light of certain one-time revenue and operating income benefits and other company and individual performance considerations, our compensation committee determined that it was reasonable and appropriate to decrease the amount otherwise payable to our eligible NEOs under the 2026 Bonus Plan based on our actual performance relative to the preestablished corporate performance goals and payout methodology described above. As a result, each NEO received the following incentive payments for fiscal year 2026:

Prior to our initial public offering (our “IPO”), all of the stock options we granted were made pursuant to our 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2011 Plan”). Following our IPO, our compensation committee offers long-term incentive compensation opportunities in the form of equity awards granted under the terms of our 2021 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2021 Plan”). Pursuant to the 2021 Plan, our compensation committee may grant equity awards to our non-employee directors, employees (including executive officers) and consultants, and our affiliates, to enable us to obtain and retain the services of these individuals, which we believe is essential to our long-term success.

We generally align the timing of our annual equity awards to our executive officers, including the NEOs, with their annual performance evaluations. In fiscal year 2026, our compensation committee approved the grant of annual equity awards to our then-serving NEOs other than Mr. Read in the form of RSUs and PSUs to motivate and reward executives for long-term company performance and align their interests with stockholder interests and changes in stockholder value. The fiscal year 2026 annual equity awards were delivered 75% in RSUs and 25% in PSUs. The greater emphasis on RSUs was intended to motivate and reward executives for long-term company performance while providing program durability across varying market conditions, reducing over-reliance on a limited set of performance metrics and aligning executive incentives with stockholder interests and long-term value creation.

The RSUs, which were approved in March of 2025 and had a grant date aligned with our regular monthly approval cadence, vest over a four-year period, with one-fourth of the RSUs vesting on March 15, 2026, and one-twelfth of the remaining RSUs vesting on each subsequent June 15, September 15, December 15 and March 15 (each such date, a “Quarterly Vesting Date”) thereafter, subject to the executive officer’s continuous service on each such vesting date. The PSUs also were approved in March of 2025 and had a grant date aligned with our monthly grant cycle. 75% of the PSUs will be earned and vest contingent on our relative total stockholder return (“relative TSR”) over a three-year performance period compared to a board of directors-approved comparator group, and the remaining 25% of the PSUs will be earned and vest contingent on the attainment of specific preestablished revenue-growth and operating income-related targets measured at the end of a three-year performance period, in each case, subject to the executive officer’s continued service with us through such vesting and settlement date. For each type of PSU, the executive officer will be eligible to vest in a number of PSUs ranging from 0% to 200% of the target number of PSUs granted and allocated to that award type, based on attainment of the applicable performance targets during the three-year performance period.

Equity awards also may be granted by our compensation committee to our executive officers, including the NEOs, at the time of hire or from time to time to incentivize and reward certain performance and/or to satisfy our retention objectives. The equity award value, vesting requirements and type of award for these ad hoc grants may vary depending on the purpose of the award. All annual equity awards granted to our executive officers, including the NEOs, new hire and promotion awards generally are granted in alignment with our regular monthly approval cadence.

The following table sets forth the PSUs and RSUs granted to our NEOs in fiscal year 2026:

For additional information on the outstanding equity awards granted to the NEOs, see the “Fiscal Year 2026 Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table and the “Outstanding Equity Awards as of January 31, 2026” table under “Executive Compensation Tables.”

We have entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Read and employment offer letters with each of our other NEOs. Each of these agreements established the NEO’s initial base salary, initial target annual cash bonus opportunity, and initial equity award recommendation. Each of Ms. Corso and Messrs. Macwan, Millard, Read and Suri’s agreements also included a one-time signing bonus, which is subject to prorated recovery if the NEO is terminated for cause within one year of the NEO’s start date (or, for Mr. Read, prorated recovery if Mr. Read is terminated for cause within two years of his start date); Mr. Read also is entitled to certain severance payments and benefits under his agreement upon a qualifying termination of employment, subject to specific requirements, including signing and not revoking a separation agreement and a general release of claims in favor of Sprinklr; and each of Ms. Corso and Messrs. Coletta, Millard and Suri also is entitled to six months’ accelerated vesting of equity awards upon a qualifying termination of employment prior to the second anniversary of such executive’s start date. The base salaries, target annual cash bonus opportunities and equity awards of our executive officers, including our NEOs, are reviewed annually by our compensation committee; the amounts effective for fiscal year 2026 are described above in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

In May 2019, our board of directors approved change of control and severance benefits for our then executive officers, including our NEOs (other than Mr. Read), and other key employees, pursuant to our Executive Severance and Change in Control Plan (as amended from time to time, the “Severance Plan”). Regardless of the manner in which a participant’s service terminates, each participant is entitled to receive amounts earned during such participant’s term of service, including unpaid salary, health and welfare benefits and other compensation entitlements.

The Severance Plan provides that if we terminate a participant’s employment outside of the period beginning three (3) months prior to and ending twelve (12) months after a “change in control” (as defined in the Severance Plan) (such period, the “change in control period”) other than for “cause” (as defined in the Severance Plan), death or disability, the NEO will receive the following:

The Severance Plan also provides that if a participant’s employment is terminated during the change in control period either by us other than for cause, death or disability or by the participant due to a “constructive termination” (as defined within the NEO’s participation agreement), the NEO will receive the following:

The treatment of any performance-based equity awards will be subject to the terms and conditions of the award agreements for such vested performance awards.

The Severance Plan provides that if any payments or benefits received by an NEO under the Severance Plan or otherwise would constitute “parachute payments” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code

of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and be subject to excise taxes imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, such amount will either be delivered in full or reduced so as not to be subject to excise taxation, whichever amount is higher. The Severance Plan does not require us to provide any tax reimbursement payments or “gross ups.”

To receive the payments and benefits described above, the NEO must sign and not revoke our standard separation agreement and a general release of claims in favor of Sprinklr within the timeframe that is set forth in the Severance Plan.

In addition to the benefits set forth in the Severance Plan, if any of Ms. Corso or Messrs. Coletta, Millard or Suri experiences a qualifying termination prior to the second anniversary of such executive’s start date, and subject to such executive’s compliance with the requirements set forth in the Severance Plan, the executive shall receive (i) accelerated vesting of six months of such executive’s outstanding and unvested RSUs and (ii) accelerated vesting of one-sixth of the target number of shares subject to such executive’s PSUs at 100% target.

Mr. Read is entitled to certain severance payments and benefits under his employment agreement upon a qualifying termination of employment, subject to specific requirements, including signing and not revoking a separation agreement and a general release of claims in favor of Sprinklr. In the event that Mr. Read’s employment with us is terminated, during the period beginning three (3) months prior to and ending twelve (12) months after a “change in control” (as defined in his employment agreement) (such period, a “change in control period”), (i) by us without “cause” (as defined in his employment agreement) or (ii) due to Mr. Read’s resignation for “good reason” (as defined in his employment agreement) (either of the terminations in (i) and (ii), a “Qualifying Termination”), Mr. Read will be entitled to receive (a) a lump sum payment equal to the sum of 18 months of his then-current base salary and 150% of his target annual cash bonus opportunity for the year of termination or resignation, payable in 12 equal monthly installments, (b) payment of COBRA premiums for up to 18 months following the date of his termination or resignation, (c) full acceleration of vesting of his outstanding and unvested RSU awards granted in connection with his appointment as President and Chief Executive Officer (the “RSU Awards”), (d) full acceleration of vesting of his PSU awards granted in connection with his appointment as President and Chief Executive Officer (the “PSU Awards”) at the greater of 100% target or actual performance and (e) full acceleration of any future equity awards on the same terms as the RSU Awards and PSU Awards, as applicable.

In the event that Mr. Read dies or becomes “disabled” (as defined in his employment agreement), or, outside of a change in control period, he experiences a Qualifying Termination, he (or his estate, if applicable) will be entitled to receive (a) a lump sum payment equal to the sum of 12 months of his then-current base salary payable in 12 equal monthly installments, (b) a lump sum pro rata payment equal to 100% of his target annual cash bonus opportunity for the year of termination or resignation, payable when executive bonuses are otherwise paid, (c) payment of COBRA premiums for up to 12 months following the date of his termination or resignation, (d) accelerated vesting of an additional 12-months of his outstanding and unvested RSU Awards, (e) acceleration of vesting of one-third of the target number of shares subject to his PSU Awards at 100% target and (f) acceleration of any future equity awards on the same terms as the RSU Awards and PSU Awards, as applicable.

The foregoing severance payments and benefits for Mr. Read are provided in lieu of benefits set forth under the Severance Plan or any similar plan that may be adopted by us.

For a more detailed description of the Severance Plan and each of our NEO’s payment and benefits upon a termination of employment or change in control, see the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” table under “Executive Compensation Tables.”

On September 3, 2025, we announced that Mr. Sarin would leave the Company on September 19, 2025 (such period “Transition Period”). During the Transition Period, Mr. Sarin continued to be paid his current base salary and was eligible to participate in our benefit plans pursuant to the terms of those plans. At the end of the Transition Period, the circumstances of Mr. Sarin’s departure entitled him to severance benefits consistent with the Severance Plan. As set forth in that certain Transition, Separation and Release of Claims Agreement between the Company and Mr. Sarin, dated September 23, 2025, Mr. Sarin continues to be subject to customary continuing obligations post-employment, such as his obligations of confidentiality and to abide by applicable restrictive covenants.

Our NEOs are eligible to participate in a defined contribution retirement plan that provides eligible U.S. employees with an opportunity to save for retirement on a tax advantaged basis. Eligible employees may defer eligible compensation on a pre-tax or after-tax (“Roth”) basis, up to the statutorily prescribed annual limits on contributions under the Code. We may make discretionary matching contributions for the plan year ending December 31st, based on employee deferrals for the plan year. For the 2023, 2024 and 2025 plan years, we made matching contributions equal to 30% of a participant’s eligible compensation up to the first 4% of such person’s elected deferral. Contributions are allocated to each participant’s individual account and are then invested in selected investment alternatives according to the participant’s directions. The 401(k) plan is intended to be qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code with the 401(k) plan’s related trust intended to be tax exempt under Section 501(a) of the Code. As a tax-qualified retirement plan, contributions to the 401(k) plan (except for after-tax, Roth contributions) and earnings on those contributions are not taxable to the employees until distributed from the 401(k) plan.

Our NEOs are eligible to participate in all of our health and welfare benefit plans, such as the 401(k) plan (see the section above titled “401(k) Plan”), medical, dental, vision, disability and life insurance, in each case generally on the same basis as other employees. We do not currently have qualified or nonqualified defined benefit plans or non-qualified deferred compensation plans, nor do we offer pension or other retirement benefits, other than our 401(k) plan. Our compensation committee may elect to adopt such plans in the future if it determines that doing so is in our best interests.

We provide certain perquisites and other personal benefits to our executive officers, including our NEOs, principally to allow them to devote more time to our business and to promote their health and safety. Our NEOs may participate in an annual executive physical program that provides each of them with a comprehensive health and wellness examination that goes beyond the standard physical examinations covered by most insurance programs with the goal of reducing the risk for a significant business disruption by striving to prevent and/or timely treat executive illness. In addition, we may from time to time provide reasonable relocation or signing bonuses to our executive officers as our compensation committee determines appropriate to assist such individuals to commence employment with us.

As a general matter, our compensation committee reviews and considers the various tax and accounting implications of compensation programs we utilize.

Under Section 162(m) of the Code (“Section 162(m)”), compensation paid to each of our “covered employees” that exceeds $1 million per taxable year is generally non-deductible unless the compensation qualifies for certain grandfathered exceptions (including the “performance-based compensation” exception) for certain compensation paid pursuant to a written binding contract in effect on November 2, 2017 and not materially modified on or after such date.

Although our compensation committee will continue to consider tax implications as one factor in determining executive compensation, our compensation committee also looks at other factors in making its decisions and retains the flexibility to provide compensation for our NEOs in a manner consistent with the goals of our executive compensation program and the best interests of Sprinklr and our stockholders, which may include providing for compensation that is not deductible by Sprinklr due to the deduction limit under Section 162(m). Our compensation committee also retains the flexibility to modify compensation that was initially intended to be exempt from the deduction limit under Section 162(m) if it determines that such modifications are consistent with Sprinklr’s business needs.

Section 409A of the Code (“Section 409A”) requires that “nonqualified deferred compensation” be deferred and paid under plans or arrangements that satisfy the requirements of the statute with respect to the timing of deferral elections, timing of payments and certain other matters. Failure to satisfy these requirements can expose employees and other service providers to accelerated income tax liabilities, penalty taxes and interest on their vested compensation under

such plans. Accordingly, as a general matter, it is our intention to design and administer our compensation and benefits plans and arrangements for all of our employees and other service providers, including our NEOs, so that they are either exempt from, or satisfy the requirements of, Section 409A.

Section 280G of the Code (“Section 280G”) disallows a tax deduction with respect to excess parachute payments to certain executives of companies that undergo a change of control. In addition, Section 4999 of the Code imposes a 20% excise tax on the individual with respect to the excess parachute payments. Parachute payments are compensation linked to or triggered by a change of control and may include, but are not limited to, bonus payments, severance payments, certain fringe benefits, and payments and acceleration of vesting from long-term incentive plans including stock options, restricted stock and other equity-based compensation. Excess parachute payments are parachute payments that exceed a threshold determined under Section 280G based on the executive’s prior compensation. In approving the compensation arrangements for our NEOs, our compensation committee considers all elements of the cost to Sprinklr of providing such compensation, including the potential impact of Section 280G. Our compensation committee may, however, in its judgment, authorize compensation arrangements that could give rise to loss of deductibility under Section 280G and the imposition of excise taxes under Section 4999 when it believes that such arrangements are appropriate to attract and retain executive talent.

We follow the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation (“ASC Topic 718”), for our stock-based compensation awards. ASC Topic 718 requires companies to calculate the grant date “fair value” of their stock-based awards using a variety of assumptions. ASC Topic 718 also requires companies to recognize the compensation cost of their stock-based awards in their statements of operations over the period that an employee is required to render service in exchange for the award. Grants of stock options and RSUs under our equity incentive award plans are accounted for under ASC Topic 718. Our compensation committee considers the accounting implications of significant compensation decisions, especially in connection with decisions that relate to our equity award programs. As accounting standards change, we may revise certain programs to appropriately align accounting expenses of our equity awards with our overall executive compensation philosophy and objectives.

We maintain an Incentive Compensation Recoupment Policy, effective as of October 2, 2023, that is compliant with Exchange Act Rule 10D-1 and the applicable NYSE listing standards. Our policy applies to incentive-based compensation received by covered executive officers granted, earned or vested based wholly or in part upon the attainment of a financial reporting measure, including our stock price or total stockholder return. Our policy applies to compensation earned during the three completed fiscal years immediately preceding the date it is determined that an accounting restatement is required (excluding fiscal years completed prior to the effective date of the policy) and grants our compensation committee broad flexibility in recouping recoverable incentive compensation. The full text of our policy is included as Exhibit 97 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2024.

We maintain Stock Ownership Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) to align the interests of our officers (within the meaning of Rule 16a-1(f) under the Exchange Act) and directors with the interests of our stockholders and to further promote our commitment to sound corporate governance. The Guidelines provide that covered individuals are expected to own a

specific value of our common stock, expressed as a percentage of base salary or annual cash retainer, as applicable. The stock ownership requirement generally must be met by a covered individual by the later of (i) January 31, 2029 and (ii) the date that is five (5) years after the date on which such individual became subject to the Guidelines (the “Compliance Period”). Unexercised stock options (whether vested or unvested) and unearned performance awards are not included in the calculation of a covered individual’s stock ownership. The chart below shows the guidelines by position:

As of January 31, 2026, all of our currently serving executive officers and directors met the applicable stock ownership requirements or were within the Compliance Period for doing so.

We believe that it is improper and inappropriate for any person associated with Sprinklr to engage in short-term or speculative transactions involving our securities. Our non-employee directors, executive officers and all other employees are, therefore, prohibited from engaging in short sales and buying or selling puts, calls, options or other derivative securities related to Sprinklr common stock.

Our Insider Trading Policy also prohibits our non-employee directors, executive officers and all other employees from purchasing any financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds) or otherwise engaging in transactions that are designed to or have the effect of hedging or offsetting any decrease in the market value of our securities, whether they are granted to such individual by Sprinklr as part of such person’s compensation or otherwise held, directly or indirectly, by such individual.

In addition, our Insider Trading Policy prohibits purchasing our common stock on margin or holding it in a margin account and pledging our securities as collateral for a loan.

Our compensation committee has reviewed our compensation policies and practices to assess whether they encourage our employees to take inappropriate risks. After reviewing and assessing our compensation philosophy, policies and practices, including the mix of fixed and variable, short- and long-term incentives and overall pay, incentive plan structures, and the checks and balances built into, and oversight of, each plan and practice, our compensation committee has determined that any risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for our employees are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Sprinklr as a whole. Further, our compensation committee believes that the mix and design of the elements of executive compensation do not encourage management to assume excessive risks; the mix of short-term compensation (in the form of base salary and an annual cash bonus opportunity, if any, which is based on a variety of performance factors), and long-term incentive compensation prevents undue focus on short-term results and helps align the interests of our executive officers with the interests of our stockholders.

The compensation committee has reviewed and discussed the section of this proxy statement titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” with management. Based on such review and discussion, the compensation committee has recommended to the board of directors that the section titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference into our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2026.

Sprinklr, Inc.

Compensation Committee

The material in this report is not “soliciting material,” is furnished to, but not deemed “filed” with, the SEC and is not deemed to be incorporated by reference in any filing of Sprinklr under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, other than Sprinklr’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, where it shall be deemed to be “furnished,” whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.

The following table sets forth information for each of the last three fiscal years ended January 31, 2026, 2025 and 2024 regarding compensation awarded to or paid to, or earned by, our NEOs.

The following table presents information regarding each plan-based award granted to our NEOs during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2026. All equity awards were granted pursuant to our 2021 Plan.